| Stac PPP ISDN | MPEG & Co | Dolby AAC | MBROLA | VoIP | ASF |
I'm a professional software developer who early summer 1998 wrote a computer program that I decided to put on my homepage. The program turned out to be a tremendous success and was quickly distributed in millions of copies, obviously filling a need among many computer users. I quickly started to improve my program and release new versions. That same autumn I was contacted by a large company with a competing product, who claimed that my program infringed on certain patents they had been granted. Consulting SEPTO gave no reason to take infringement claims seriously since computer programs are not patentable as such, but in early 1999 my legal advisor explained that the legal uncertainty lately introduced by EPO would perhaps make the claims valid. That eventually forced me to stop making my program available.
Do you believe a corporation should have the right to control what computer programs I can write and publish?
You are probably already aware of this -- some important patents regarding video compression are coming up, particularly relating to MPEG4; I've talked to the attorney who is the primary examiner on this patent cluster, and he actually rejected some of them last September (from major multinationals) based on over-breadth. It's wait-and-see. PacketVideo has just gotten an important patent on an error reduction algorithm relating to video compression in low-bandwidth situations that could have been applied very usefully, had it been freely distributed.
One particularly broad and already much discussed patent in this area is at the basis of RealAudio:
US 6,151,634
Audio-on-demand communication system
The Moving Picture Experts Group Audio Layer III compression format, more generally known as MP3, began life in the mid-1980s at the Fraunhofer Institut in Germany.
It is doubtful whether the calculation rule covered by DE3629434 really took a long time to find. Also it is somewhat strange that a 12 year old patent was nominated "patent of the month". But it seems clear that the MP3 patents are showcased as cases of "good software patents", since they cover solutions to difficult problems and may involve some empirical knowledge.